"Pure gaming" is Intel marketing propaganda. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities. Intel Core i9-10900K, Core i7-10700K, Core i5-10600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X OC Tests; 15. Another route is that you could also prepare for the Nvidia 3000 series and the Intel Rocket Lake or AMD 4000 series that's just around the corner. Those perfectly scalable multithread workloads are not very common. However I’m not sure when pcie 4 will even be useful, likely only on 1k+ gpus in the next 5-10 years. Get on tech sites (Anandtech, Tomshardware, etc), and try to find some benchmarks for the software that you'll use, and which one provides better performance overall, or better performance for the money. 10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs … 10700k vs 3700x reddit 04.11.2020. Also don't listen to "gaming intel, anything else AMD" simplification. Press J to jump to the feed. 10700K 15.2% higher fps vs 3900X : View attachment 182187 10700K 15.6% higher fps vs 3900X : View attachment 182188 Notice that lowly 10400 besting the 3900X … Even if it performs otherworldly. 3700x can do 144hz pretty reliably in almost any game provided your gpu can do it as well, so there will be a handful of games (mostly poorly optimized single core heavy titles like Escape From Tarkov or flight sim 2020) that benefit noticeably from the higher clock speeds of the 10700k… The only way a 3900X could beat a 10900K in gaming is if you run something in the background with very heavy CPU load while playing. The reviewers generally test gaming and almost perfectly scalable multithreaded tasks such as rendering. That’s the option to future proof the most while trying to build now. 3900x. One thing we … The 10700K is clearly faster for gaming and if I were building a gaming PC with this budget at the moment I would be looking at the 10600K or 10700K. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. This! I'm seeing new things everyday. Looking at upgrading my current PC and for what's in my price range the Ryzen is the one I wish to go with, but I also know the 10700k … I know the Ryzen would be nice for editing 4k GoPro footage. I don't think any kinda gaming + general background apps workload is gonna need more than 16 threads in the next 4 years so that kinda takes 10900k and 3900x out of the picture. 3. 10700k vs 3900x. Any advice is greatly appreciated, thank you. This also applies to 3900X vs 10700K, … 3900x… At the end of the day, in my opinion the 3900k is the better chip which is why I bought it. Alt-tab & watch videos, browse etc. It's the $300 3700x VS … The 10700K’s $400 USD price tag puts it in a similar price band to AMD’s 12-core hyperthreaded Ryzen 9 3900X, however, the 10700K’s faster cores combined with its lower memory latency, … And mostly they seem to be memory limited as they have to run huge amount of data through the algorithms. For anything* other than pure gaming the 3900x is better. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in … Planning on building a computer but need some advice? 1440p gaming won't see a noticeable difference between almost any chip you'd consider. Very glad I did; I feel like I dodged a bad build decision. … The margins remain much the same at 1440p, with the 10700K … I know, that Intel is the best when it comes to single core performance, but the ryzen chip makes up to that by having 6 cores more... which one is better? I would recommend a 3700x and spending more on the GPU for most people. Thank you. while gaming? Get the Ryzen. It means that, in most games, a 10900k will either tie with a 3900x or have a slight lead over AMD in FPS results. Thank you, and yeah I know it's hard (impossible) to give a true comparison of the two but I know also sometimes we have a good insight into what the next is going to be capable of and I haven't been following it. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race. Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. We do know the performance of the 10700 will be just like any generation change for the current intel 14nm node. Any workflow whatsoever? Anthony Butler Linkedin, 2. Until NVIDIA releases the new Ampere 3000 series, and AMD releases Big Navi (supposedly around September or October if rumours are true), the 2080 Ti is the most powerful consumer GPU. If you're gonna take advantage of those cores, then get 3900x, Thank you, when comparing those 2 I wish to go with the 3900x so I guess that answers my question, If you want to use a 480mm rad to cool the 10700k sure, Didn't realize the heat was going to be that bad on it thank you. For the gamer sitting in his or her chair in front of their computer, these FPS results are so marginal that they are not noticeable to the eye, and they have absolutely no effect on the game play experience. I literally just saw information the other day on the 10700k dropping around April and though shoot. (10 Cores/20 Threads)Intel Core i7-10700K Stock. I bought into the clock speed marketing too until I realized that Intel was just recycling the same chips with slight improvements, purposefully not innovating because they owned the market. What it means is that they technically have the highest FPS results in most games (the 3900x has surprisingly beaten the 10900k in several game benchmarks even overclocked). Gaming Benchmarks: Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Core i7-10700K. Again, the 10700K was faster than the 3900X, but this time we’re talking about just a 5% performance advantage at 1080p. There’s not much difference between … 3900x. 3900x is really for professionals or streamers. Ryzen CPUs above the R5 3600 don't really make sense for gaming builds IMO. Given a set budget of 1800 euros, for a pure gaming build I think it makes more sense to downgrade anyways and put the extra money towards the GPU. Intel Core i9-10900K Stock. Posted by 8 months ago. I guess the 10700K will be better for gaming thanks to the frequency advantage (although it will need a hefty cooling solution I suppose, it's basically a tuned up 9900K) while the 3900X will be better for anything else. I use my PC primarily for gaming with the occasional streaming. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? Ive been looking to upgrade for a bit and see that 10th gen is on the horizon. Your 12C / 24T 3900X with dual 240mm AIO coolers gets whipped in Time Spy CPU by a 8C / 16T 10700K with a 4.9Ghz all core turbo and DDR4-4400 (which you probably … This depends on what you want to do with the PC. What is this? Archived. Get the Ryzen. Purely gaming? Building a machine for work and play? 10600k for gaming but 10900k for 240hz gaming. The 10700K will edge out any Ryzen chip right now, but at higher resolutions the differences are a wash without a 2080Ti to exaggerate the differences. 10700k/kf will be better in super high refresh rate gaming ie >144hz. The "pure gaming" claim is Intel marketing spin. Looking at upgrading my current PC and for what's in my price range the Ryzen is the one I wish to go with, but I also know the 10700k will be dropping shortly and I don't know if I should wait and see it's performance and price or not. 10th gen doesn’t support pcie 4 but 11 will on the same z490 board. Want to stream? Just as an example, i work with matlab and some medical imaging related algorithms. We don't know the performance yet so there's little point in comparing the two other than the 8 cores vs 12 cores part. There are a lot of tasks in e.g. I think the 3900x and mid range mobos for it are cheaper, but I haven't shopped it recently. Seriously, though, I commend you for having the courage to say something, which as someone who admittedly has a loyalty for Intel (they have served us well for the past years), feels great. The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X.Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, … The closest thing to a 3700X on the newer ones is a faster 3800XT. A guy who praises Intel for something that doesn't get downvoted to hell & back? AMD’s 3900X at stock and 4.3GHz ends up the highest-performing Ryzen part, allowing the 10900K stock CPU a lead of about 5.4%. Now exactly what does this mean? Matlab itself runs multithreaded operations but the problem is that most tasks are series of small operations where you can only multithread in each individual operation rather than multithread from start to finish like in tile based rendering. Practically speaking, this has zero effect on the end user of the product -- the gamer. 10700k vs 3900x. Alt-tab & watch videos, browse etc. Bottom line, seek the right product for what you are doing with the CPU. Zen 3 is probably going to tilt AMD further and the 7+ nm node is going to improve density by 20% and power consumption reduction of about 10%. However, if you have the money to spend on a quality CPU that is able to handle innumerable processes, then the Ryzen 9 3900x … 3900x. So basically I should go with amd when I'm doing a lot of multithread operations, and when it's more for gaming and rendering I should go with Intel? This is the place to ask! Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. *I'm sure someone could probably nitpick and find a narrow exception, but the overwhelming majority of non-gaming stuff. I was about to get the 9900k, even bought a mobo, returned it and bought an X570 Aorus Master and 3900x. It's total BS. Close. In general the 3900X seems to be faster in the majority of non-gaming tasks but that's not universally true. Which one is a better in your opinion for a 1500-1800 dollar pc. Consider chips like the 3700X or 10600K for mostly equivalent gaming performance to their more expensive options you're considering, especially if you're considering a 1440p or 4K monitor. I am upgrading from an i7 7700k. Gotta pick the right tool for the job, duder. Choose for what you will be doing with the machine. We're not you, so we can't really tell you which is the better option. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The 10700K’s $400 USD price tag puts it in a similar price band to AMD’s 12-core hyperthreaded Ryzen 9 3900X, however, the 10700K’s faster cores combined with its lower memory latency, yield a 12% effective speed advantage over the 3900X. engineering that cannot be multithreaded well. Intel Core i9-10900K, Core i7-10700K, Core i5 … We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz Intel Core i7 10700K against the 3.9 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. If OP can wait, he should consider building in the fall or winter when NextGen drops -- mainly because the PSU supply is sold out across North America, as well as other PC parts. As far as your TDP concerns I would recommend ignoring the intel tdp ratings all together. while gaming? I would pick a 10700K as it comes with some hardware security mitigation and higher stock clocks. "Pure gaming" is Intel marketing propaganda. Press J to jump to the feed. Photoshop and the Adobe suite has an Intel preference while most rendering workloads will happily gobble up the extra Ryzen cores for a performance boost. 10900k only really makes sense if you play CPU bottlenecked games like squad or star citizen. The Ryzen 7 3800X is an 8-core, 16-thread high end desktop Zen 2 processor, built on AMD’s seminal 7nm manufacturing process. Looking to save money? TL;DR -- "Purely gaming" is a BS marketing term invented by Intel to hide the fact that they have been recycling the same CPU "generation" after "generation" with minor adjustments, and AMD has finally caught them and provided a superior product at the price point. The 10700k is a rebranded 9900k. If money's not a problem and you want a little more fps go for 9900k or 10700k. Then when next gen intel comes out upgrade to a i7 or i9. 10700k is basically gonna be the same as a 9900k. Sure you might get a few FPS where you can't tell the difference. The limitations of current GPUs is where the bottleneck lies. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. What gamers will experience is GPU bottlenecks before they ever experience a CPU bottleneck. I just evaluated how the implementations i've been using run on my home machine and turns out most of them run almost entirely single threaded. This is the place to ask! We’ll primarily be comparing the Ryzen 7 3800XT against Intel’s 10th Gen Core i7-10700K which is selling for … Then you’ll be comparing apples to apples in terms of soon to be released. It has a boost clock speed of 4.5 GHz, overtaking the … See how your specific workloads prefer Zen or Skylake cores. Any workflow whatsoever? The key difference, of course, is the price. Leaked 10700 (non K) performance numbers place it at the same performance level as 3700X, so 3900X will be faster, especially at multi-threaded loads. GPUs are pushing FPS with modern AAA games. Based on the older benches the 9900k is very close to the 3900X in Photoshop, so the 10700k … Oh jeez didn't even think of that, now I'm going to have to look into the timeline of the 4900x and see, I was so excited to get my tax check because that was going to determine when and now all of this, lol. I'm in the same boat as you, but imho it's worth waiting to see what drops in a few months. If you're planning on doing some sort of non-gaming task, you should look up benchmarks for whatever task you're planning on doing and see how the CPUs compare. Well the proper comparison would be to compare intel to the yet released 4900x. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8... Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K) $344.99 The Ryzen 9 3900x is about 30% more expensive than the Intel Core i7 10700K, possibly pushing it out of the comfortable price range of many people. Want to stream? I was about to get the 9900k, even bought a mobo, returned it and bought an X570 Aorus Master and 3900x. A fair and objective summary without "fanboyism" well done. Given that the 10700k is slightly ahead of the 3800XT, it shouldn't have any trouble beating the 3700X. So just do 9900k vs 3900x. I chose Intel again because the performance will be noticeable and even more so while streaming. i'm buildind a pc at around 1800 euros, and i want to know which CPU to buy. The 10700k is a rebranded 9900k. Looking at the Core i7 10700K, however, it is a solid 15% faster on average for exporting while the Ryzen 7 3800X only pulls ahead by about 3% for live playback. Yeah, I'm definitely not investing more that 600 Euros into a GPU. The 10700K doesn't have a direct Ryzen 3000 competitor on the pricing front yet, with the ~$415 Ryzen 9 3900X serving as a step up with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the … Both are 8c/16t, and the 10700k is clocked a wee bit higher. (8 Cores/16 Threads)Intel Core i5-10600K Stock. If you're looking for the best gaming experience in that price range I would look at GPU and Monitor first then build around that. One option I would consider is if you want to build now to get a z490 board and a lesser cpu like i5. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I play mostly poorly optimized games, like Squad, Arma, Tarkov, and DayZ. 9900k vs 3900x gaming reddit. As per a notification shared on Twitter, Intel is already discontinuing its 10th Gen Comet Lake-S desktop lineup, with the product discontinuance program reportedly already in …

Amy Hayes Singer, Google Voice Not Working On Iphone, Facts About Geoffrey Chaucer Early Life, How To Cook Red Bean Soup Fast, Matt Michalski Rookie, Bella Pizza Singapore Menu, John Hurt Spouse, Gone Too Long,